A non-cringey survey - that helps coalitions understand themselves


Today, I’m going to talk about surveys.

Reader, does that make you cringe?

I understand if it does. Surveys get a bad rap.

We’re often trying to get participants in a program or members of a community to take a survey, and - often - we don’t provide enough context for them to buy into the value of the information they’re sharing or for them to believe any changes will result from their input. To be fair, and to make matters worse, oftentimes there aren’t changes made as a result of survey responses.

There is a time and place for participant/community surveys, we certainly use them in our work here at PoP Health, and we have some thoughts on how to make them less painful and more impactful - more to come on that in a later newsletter.

But today, I’m here to talk about a kind of survey that doesn’t have quite as many potential pitfalls. A non-cringey survey, if you will.

This is a survey that coalitions and collaboratives can use to reflect on themselves. For lack of a better name, we call them partnership surveys.

These surveys are solely for members of the coalition, and the results help coalition members understand who they are and what they bring to the table, where they already have a lot of energy and expertise to move things forward, and where they may have gaps that need to be filled.

As per the latest guidance from the National Association of City and County Health Officials (NACCHO)’s, by way of their Mobilizing Action through Planning and Partnerships 2.0 process, local health departments are encouraged to begin their community health improvement assessment process with exactly this kind of survey (they call it a Community Partners Assessment).

I mentioned this briefly in the last issue of Community Threads, but we used this kind of survey in advance of our kick-off meeting with the Perry County Health Coalition in Pennsylvania earlier this month. At the meeting, we shared the survey results - which painted a picture of:

  • Top action planning priorities;
  • What members hope to accomplish via participation in the coalition;
  • Current coalition composition, sectors and topics represented, populations touched by coalition member organizations, and suggestions around organizations, individuals, and communities to engage (either directly as coalition members or at other levels of engagement);
  • Alignment between member organization focus areas and focus areas identified in the 2022 health assessment the coalition completed;
  • Current and desired levels of engagement in the coalition;
  • Activities and tasks members are most interested in supporting;
  • Desired meeting format, frequency, and scheduling.

As you can imagine, by gathering this information ahead of the meeting and then sharing the synthesized responses and drawing out the key takeaways, we were able to facilitate a much more meaningful, nuanced discussion about where to go from here.

And since we were only surveying members of the coalition - who were already bought into the work of the coalition and wanted to actively use the results to inform their work - this survey rated pretty high on the non-cringey scale.

Have I convinced you that partnership surveys are non-cringey, Reader? Feel free to disagree with me (or share other examples of non-cringey surveys!) - drop me a line!

Until next time,

Vinu

PS Learn something in this newsletter? Spread the word! Forward this email to a friend or colleague who might want to weave their own community threads.

PPS Want to learn more about PoP Health and how we partner with community coalitions and collaboratives to transform health in communities through policy and systems change? Check out our website!

Copyright © 2023 PoP Health, All rights reserved.

You’re receiving this email because you signed up for the Community Threads newsletter. We’re delighted to have you be a part of our community. There’s nothing we respect more than community, so rest assured, your contact information is safe with us. If you’re no longer interested in learning how to work with communities to transform health, Unsubscribe or Change Your Preferences​

If you need our mailing address, you can reach us at 3056 Hickory Grove Ct, Fairfax, VA 22031.
​

Welcome to Community Threads!

Subscribe to the Community Threads newsletter for tools and strategies your coalition can put into action today.

Read more from Welcome to Community Threads!

Reader, turns out the answer to everything isn’t 42. Or 6-7 for that matter (sorry, I couldn’t help myself!). It’s BUY IN. Okay, maybe not the answer to everything but in the world of coalitions, it IS the answer to a lot of questions: Q: How do we get more things done? A: Buy-in. Q: How do we get coalition members to participate meaningfully in our meetings? A: Buy-in. Q: How do we get local policymakers to make the changes our community needs? A: Buy-in. Q: How do we get new leadership to...

Well, Reader, did that subject line catch you off guard? It might not be something you’d expect me to say - me, someone who has drunk the “systems change” Kool-aid from way back in my undergrad engineering days throughout my public health training and into launching PoP Health (where our entire mission is to work with community coalitions to transform health through systems change). But at a conference a few months ago, I heard someone say something that has really stuck with me because of...

video preview

Our public health frameworks are failing us, Reader. They're true. AND they're failing us. Let me explain why. I had the pleasure of giving a Lightning Talk at the National Network of Public Health Institutes Open Forum conference in Pittsburgh earlier this month (it was a balm to the soul to be in the company of fellow community-based public health practitioners!) Here’s how and why our public health frameworks are failing us, the one thing we're missing, and what we need instead: Now, let...